Novolimus (80%)
featured

    WARNING: This product is for research use only, not for human or veterinary use.

Hodoodo CAT#: H461163

CAS#: 151519-50-5

Description: Novolimus is a macrocyclic lactone with anti-proliferative properties, has a similar efficacy to currently available agents but it requires a lower dose and is therefore conceivably safer to use.


Chemical Structure

img
Novolimus (80%)
CAS# 151519-50-5

Theoretical Analysis

Hodoodo Cat#: H461163
Name: Novolimus (80%)
CAS#: 151519-50-5
Chemical Formula: C50H77NO13
Exact Mass: 899.54
Molecular Weight: 900.160
Elemental Analysis: C, 66.72; H, 8.62; N, 1.56; O, 23.11

Price and Availability

Size Price Availability Quantity
5mg USD 650 2 Weeks
10mg USD 1150 2 Weeks
25mg USD 2150 2 Weeks
Bulk inquiry

Synonym: Novolimus; CJ-12263; CJ 12263; CJ12263; 7-O-Demethyl Cypher; 7-O-Demethyl Rapammune; 7-O-Demethyl Sirolimus; 7-O-Demethyl Rapamycin;

IUPAC/Chemical Name: A name could not be generated for this structure.

InChi Key: ZHYGVVKSAGDVDY-QQQXYHJWSA-N

InChi Code: InChI=1S/C50H77NO13/c1-29-15-11-10-12-16-30(2)40(53)27-37-20-18-35(7)50(60,64-37)47(57)48(58)51-22-14-13-17-38(51)49(59)63-42(32(4)25-36-19-21-39(52)43(26-36)61-8)28-41(54)31(3)24-34(6)45(56)46(62-9)44(55)33(5)23-29/h10-12,15-16,24,29,31-33,35-40,42-43,45-46,52-53,56,60H,13-14,17-23,25-28H2,1-9H3/b12-10+,15-11+,30-16+,34-24+/t29-,31-,32-,33-,35-,36+,37+,38+,39-,40+,42+,43-,45-,46+,50-/m1/s1

SMILES Code: CO[C@@H]1C[C@@H](CC[C@H]1O)C[C@H]([C@@H]2CC([C@@H](/C=C([C@H]([C@H](C([C@@H](C[C@@H](/C=C/C=C/C=C([C@H](C[C@@H]3CC[C@H]([C@@](O3)(C(C(N4CCCC[C@H]4C(O2)=O)=O)=O)O)C)O)\C)C)C)=O)OC)O)\C)C)=O)C

Appearance: Solid powder

Purity: ~80% (or refer to the Certificate of Analysis)

Shipping Condition: Shipped under ambient temperature as non-hazardous chemical. This product is stable enough for a few weeks during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs.

Storage Condition: Dry, dark and at 0 - 4 C for short term (days to weeks) or -20 C for long term (months to years).

Solubility: Soluble in DMSO

Shelf Life: >3 years if stored properly

Drug Formulation: This drug may be formulated in DMSO

Stock Solution Storage: 0 - 4 C for short term (days to weeks), or -20 C for long term (months).

HS Tariff Code: 2934.99.03.00

More Info:

Biological target:
In vitro activity:
In vivo activity:

Preparing Stock Solutions

The following data is based on the product molecular weight 900.16 Batch specific molecular weights may vary from batch to batch due to the degree of hydration, which will affect the solvent volumes required to prepare stock solutions.

Recalculate based on batch purity %
Concentration / Solvent Volume / Mass 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 1.15 mL 5.76 mL 11.51 mL
5 mM 0.23 mL 1.15 mL 2.3 mL
10 mM 0.12 mL 0.58 mL 1.15 mL
50 mM 0.02 mL 0.12 mL 0.23 mL
Formulation protocol:
In vitro protocol:
In vivo protocol:

Molarity Calculator

Calculate the mass, volume, or concentration required for a solution.
=
x
x
g/mol

*When preparing stock solutions always use the batch-specific molecular weight of the product found on the vial label and SDS / CoA (available online).

Reconstitution Calculator

The reconstitution calculator allows you to quickly calculate the volume of a reagent to reconstitute your vial. Simply enter the mass of reagent and the target concentration and the calculator will determine the rest.

=
÷

Dilution Calculator

Calculate the dilution required to prepare a stock solution.
x
=
x

1: Wiebe J, Bauer T, Dörr O, Möllmann H, Hamm CW, Nef HM. Implantation of a novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with a strut thickness of 100 µm showing evidence of self-correction. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jun;11(2):204. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M02_01. PubMed PMID: 25671516.

2: Iqbal J, Verheye S, Abizaid A, Ormiston J, de Vries T, Morrison L, Toyloy S, Fitzgerald P, Windecker S, Serruys PW. DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent is superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent at five-year follow-up: final results of the multicentre EXCELLA II randomised controlled trial. EuroIntervention. 2016 Dec 10;12(11):e1336-e1342. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M10_04. PubMed PMID: 26465374.

3: Braun D, Baquet M, Massberg S, Mehilli J, Hausleiter J. Collapse of a Bioresorbable Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Scaffold. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):e13-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Dec 9. PubMed PMID: 26685077.

4: Amber KI, Hadi NR, Muhammad-Baqir BM, Jamil DA, Al-Aubaidy HA. Trimetazidine attenuates the acute inflammatory response induced by Novolimus eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.172. Epub 2016 Jun 27. PubMed PMID: 27390979.

5: Porto I, Vergallo R, Sangiorgi GM, Burzotta F, Garbo R, D'Amario D, Trani C, Rebuzzi AG, Crea F. DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold failure assessed by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography imaging. Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Jun;27(4):334-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000350. PubMed PMID: 26882020.

6: Boeder NF, Koepp T, Dörr O, Bauer T, Mattesini A, Elsässer A, Möllmann H, Blachutzik F, Achenbach S, Ghanem A, Hamm CW, Nef HM. A new novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold for large coronary arteries: an OCT study of acute mechanical performance. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.160. Epub 2016 Jun 26. PubMed PMID: 27393853.

7: Serruys PW, Garg S, Abizaid A, Ormiston J, Windecker S, Verheye S, Dubois C, Stewart J, Hauptmann KE, Schofer J, Stangl K, Witzenbichler B, Wiemer M, Barbato E, de Vries T, den Drijver AM, Otake H, Meredith L, Toyloy S, Fitzgerald P. A randomised comparison of novolimus-eluting and zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents: 9-month follow-up results of the EXCELLA II study. EuroIntervention. 2010 Jun;6(2):195-205. doi: 10.4244/. PubMed PMID: 20562069.

8: Abizaid A, Costa RA, Schofer J, Ormiston J, Maeng M, Witzenbichler B, Botelho RV, Costa JR Jr, Chamié D, Abizaid AS, Castro JP, Morrison L, Toyloy S, Bhat V, Yan J, Verheye S. Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.004. PubMed PMID: 27013155.

9: Dalal A. Organ transplantation and drug eluting stents: Perioperative challenges. World J Transplant. 2016 Dec 24;6(4):620-631. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.620. Review. PubMed PMID: 28058211; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5175219.

10: Charpentier E, Barna A, Guillevin L, Juliard JM. Fully bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds: A review. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jun-Jul;108(6-7):385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Review. PubMed PMID: 26113479.

11: Costa JR Jr, Abizaid A, Feres F, Costa R, Seixas AC, Maia F, Abizaid A, Tanajura LF, Staico R, Siqueira D, Meredith L, Bhat V, Yan J, Ormiston J, Sousa AG, Fitzgerald P, Sousa JE. EXCELLA First-in-Man (FIM) study: safety and efficacy of novolimus-eluting stent in de novo coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2008 May;4(1):53-8. PubMed PMID: 19112779.

12: Lupi A, Gabrio Secco G, Rognoni A, Lazzero M, Fattori R, Sheiban I, Sante Bongo A, Bolognese L, Agostoni P, Porto I. Meta-analysis of bioabsorbable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in 20,005 patients with coronary artery disease: an update. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):E193-206. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25416. Epub 2014 Feb 10. Review. PubMed PMID: 24478247.

13: Wiebe J, Hamm CW, Nef HM. Bioresorbable scaffolds in daily clinical routine: a practical review of all-comers results. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2015 Nov;30(6):650-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000229. Review. PubMed PMID: 26447503.

14: Schneider VS, Skurk C, Riedel M, Abdelwahed YS, Landmesser U, Leistner DM. Use of a bioresorbable novolimus eluting vascular scaffold fails a hybrid PCI strategy with drug eluting stent. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):557-559. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1091-4. Epub 2017 Apr 3. PubMed PMID: 28374059.

15: Gunes HM, Yılmaz FK, Gokdeniz T, Demir GG, Guler E, Guler GB, Karaca O, Cakal B, İbişoğlu E, Boztosun B. Is bioresorbable vascular scaffold acute recoil affected by baseline renal function and scaffold selection? Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;224:388-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 20. PubMed PMID: 27681252.

16: Blachutzik F, Boeder N, Wiebe J, Mattesini A, Dörr O, Most A, Bauer T, Röther J, Tröbs M, Schlundt C, Achenbach S, Hamm CW, Nef HM. Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Apr;106(4):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1048-z. Epub 2016 Oct 18. PubMed PMID: 27757522.

17: Nef HM, Wiebe J, Foin N, Blachutzik F, Dörr O, Toyloy S, Hamm CW. A new novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold: Present status and future clinical perspectives. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Review. PubMed PMID: 27863289.

18: Mattesini A, Bartolini S, Sorini Dini C, Valente S, Parodi G, Stolcova M, Meucci F, Di Mario C. The DESolve novolimus bioresorbable Scaffold: from bench to bedside. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S950-S958. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.25. Review. PubMed PMID: 28894601; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5583086.

19: Wiebe J, Dörr O, Ilstad H, Husser O, Liebetrau C, Boeder N, Bauer T, Möllmann H, Kastrati A, Hamm CW, Nef HM. Everolimus- Versus Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched Comparison. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.034. Epub 2017 Feb 15. PubMed PMID: 28216214.

20: Blachutzik F, Boeder N, Wiebe J, Mattesini A, Dörr O, Most A, Bauer T, Tröbs M, Röther J, Schlundt C, Achenbach S, Hamm C, Nef H. Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study. Heart Vessels. 2017 Jul;32(7):781-789. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0932-9. Epub 2016 Dec 21. PubMed PMID: 28004176.


Anna Roszkowska, Natalia Treder, Alina Plenis, Natalia Miękus, Ilona Olędzka, Piotr Kowalski, Tomasz Bączek, Optimization and comparison of two microsampling approaches for LC-MS/MS analysis of a panel of immunosuppressants in blood samples, Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, Volume 21, 2021, 100433, ISSN 2352-5541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2021.100433. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352554121000607)